Analysis: Why free the STB from operator's control?

The Wall Street Journal has a front page story today that analyzes the FCC's initiative to make cable companies support third party set-top boxes and deploy boxes with removable security. Looks great on paper, and there is the argument for XBox 360 users who would be ready IPTV users, but really what's the impetus for this right now? Cable companies, of course, have little incentive to allow others to retail STBs. And FCC Chairman Kevin Martin told the WSJ that the crux of the problem is that consumers don't have much reason to buy fancy units at retailers when they can get one cheap from a cable operator. Of course, there are also a lot of issues concerning standards.

For the full scoop on the FCC's initiative:
- see this write-up in the WSJ (sub. req.)

Suggested Articles

NCTA-The Internet and Television Association is pointing to a new report that shows the cable industry had a $450 billion impact on the U.S. economy in 2018.

CBS is warning viewers that AT&T’s pay TV services including DirecTV, DirecTV Now and U-verse could lose CBS broadcast networks soon if a new agreement isn…

Ultimately, operators will need to begin now to adopt a new data-centric approach, knowing that changes may take years to accomplish.