Consumer groups want protection from broadcaster-cable retrans squabbles

Three media watchdog groups--the Parents Television Council, Consumers Union and Free Press--would like some protection from the FCC in the event of future cable-broadcaster retransmission battles.

To carry it further, the group has opened a slimy can of worms by suggesting a form of a la carte subscription where subscribers could opt out paying for or viewing channels carried as part of a bundled retransmission agreement and get a discount for the refused channels.

"Cable customers should get what they pay for instead of being held at the mercy of these disputes between the cable companies and the broadcasters," said Joel Kelsey of Consumers Union. "Consumers should be able to choose their channels and they should get a refund when they lose access to the channels they pay for."

For more:
- see this story

Related articles:
FCC taking hands off of broadcast retransmission battles
All sides weigh in, none happily, on must-carry/retransmission issue
Broadcasters say they're not to blame for higher cable rates

Suggested Articles

Discovery, Inc. is in the early planning phases of launching a streaming video service that aggregates IP from all its brands.

Viamedia, a local video and digital advertising platform, said that its ongoing antitrust lawsuit against Comcast appears to be heading to trial.

Altice USA has struck a deal with Apple that will allow its video subscribers to buy an Apple TV 4K device from the provider and access Altice One.