Dish Network takes issue of higher satellite taxes to U.S. Supreme Court


Dish Network is taking the issue of satellite TV operators getting charged higher state taxes than cable companies to the U.S. Supreme Court.

In Florida, cable operators are charged a state communication services tax at a rate of 4.92% of subscription revenue. Satellite providers are assessed at a rate of 9.07%.

In April, the Florida Supreme Court in a 6-0 ruling sided with Florida’s Department of Revenue and the Florida Cable Telecommunications Association, rejecting a Dish appeal that sought tax-rate parity with cable operators. 


Like this story? Subscribe to FierceVideo!

The Video industry is an ever-changing world where big ideas come along daily. Cable, Media and Entertainment, Telco, and Tech companies rely on FierceVideo for the latest news, trends, and analysis on video creation and distribution, OTT delivery technologies, content licensing, and advertising strategies. Sign up today to get news and updates delivered to your inbox and read on the go.

RELATED: DirecTV loses bid to overturn Florida state telecom tax

Writing for the unanimous majority, Justice Peggy Quince rejected Dish’s claim that satellite TV represent “in state” interests, noting that both cable and satellite operators in Florida are mostly headquartered elsewhere. 

The Florida Supreme Court, however, noted that cable operators are charged the burden of local communications services taxes, which can account for 5% of subscription revenue and are not assessed on satellite carriers.

“Cable is not a local, in-state interest any more than satellite,” Quince added. “While it may be true that cable employs more Florida residents and uses more local infrastructure to provide its services, the Supreme Court has never found a company to be an in-state interest because it had a greater presence in a state.”

But in a 39-page petition to the U.S. Supreme Court, obtained by the Gainesville Sun, Dish argued that the differing communications tax rates are a form of protectionism. The company argues that it violates the “dormant” Commerce Clause of the Constitution, which bars states from discriminating against interstate commerce. 

“In particular, it forbids a state from taxing or regulating differently on the basis of where a good is produced or a service is performed,” Dish said. “That’s exactly what the unequal Florida tax does. It puts a heavier duty on pay TV programming that is assembled and delivered without using massive infrastructure within the state.”

Suggested Articles

Video product vendor Synamedia is planning to debut at IBC Show a handful of new tools to help content and service providers take on video piracy.

Key details about Apple TV+, the company’s upcoming video streaming service, are still in frustratingly short supply. But MacRumors has uncovered what could be…

Video measurement and analytics company Comscore will lay off approximately 8% of its workforce as part of a plan to reorganize its technology, product and…