Mayor: AT&T deceives town on IPTV deployment

Livermore, CA, Mayor Marshall Kamena terms AT&T's installation of Project Lightspeed cabinets and equipment in the city as "a rather deceiving incident" with AT&T being issued a permit under "false pretense." In early December last year, SBC applied for a number of encroachment permits with no mention of  Project Lightspeed. The city thought it to be routine system upgrade work on its regular phone service--until recently. Now that the city has found AT&T installing Project Lightspeed cabinets and making other upgrades to its equipment, the operator's permit has been revoked and all work has been stopped. AT&T says it's spending between $4.2 billion and $4.8 billion to upgrade and ready its IPTV networks. It also holds that as a regulated telephone company, it doesn't need to apply for a cable franchise. It's safe to say this is only the beginning of the regulatory battles between the telcos and cable operators over this nascent technology.

In a similar incident in Walnut Creek, SBC began upgrading above-ground copper wires as part of a service upgrade. However, the city required a franchise agreement as the lines would complement Project Lightspeed. AT&T (then SBC) sued Walnut Creek over the disagreement last year. Despite the resistance from Livermore and Walnut Creek, neighboring San Ramon has authorized a draft resolution in support of Project Lightspeed. AT&T plans to ultimately market the service as AT&T U-Verse.

For more on this story:
- read this article from San Jose Mercury News

Suggested Articles

The big four U.S. wireless carriers don't practice their video throttling uniformly.

When Charter and Disney earlier this week announced their new carriage agreement, they included news about cooperatively working against video piracy, which…

Cord cutters who opt for streaming video services instead of traditional pay TV will inevitably increase their broadband consumption. But some new research…