Retransmission consent: Fox wants more from stations; Belo gives in to ABC, CBS

There's some apparent bad news on the broadcast retransmission fee front. News Corp.'s (Nasdaq: NWSA) Fox Network, a group that's unabashedly enamored with getting as much money as possible for retransmitting its content, is now asking its local affiliates to dig a little deeper and contribute a little more of the retransmission fees they're getting from cable, telco and satellite providers. If they don't pay up, they may be dropped from the Fox rolls.

"I don't think they're bluffing," Needham & Co. analyst Lara Martin said, pointing to rancorous retrans negotiations between Fox and Time Warner Cable (NYSE: TWC-WI)--not to mention Cablevision Systems (NYSE: CVC).

Another programming group, Belo, has admitted that it's got a new affiliation agreement with ABC to pay for programming and that three of its five CBS affiliates also are ponying up.

Finally, Sinclair Broadcast Group (Nasdaq: SBGI), a name renowned for its recent tiff with Time Warner Cable, posted 23.5 percent higher broadcast revenues in the fourth quarter, including local broadcast revenues up 18.9 percent thanks, among other things, to "retransmission revenues," the company said in a news release.

For more:
- Bloomberg has this story
- TVNewsCheck has this story
- and this earnings release

Related articles:
Retransmission watch: Q&A with Matt Polka, president-CEO, American Cable Association
Retransmission fees pay off for News Corp. in fiscal 1Q
Time Warner Cable, Sinclair finally reach deal

Suggested Articles

When Charter and Disney earlier this week announced their new carriage agreement, they included news about cooperatively working against video piracy, which…

Cord cutters who opt for streaming video services instead of traditional pay TV will inevitably increase their broadband consumption. But some new research…

A cord-cutting catastrophe struck the U.S. pay TV industry in the second quarter and took a collective 1.53 million subscribers with it. Or maybe not, but it’s…