Should fair use restrict ESPN from pulling down World Cup goal clips?

It seems pretty straightforward to us: Should ESPN, which paid $100 million for broadcast rights to the 2010 and 2014 FIFA World Cup tournaments, and bases its business model largely on sports highlights, be allowed to pull down video clips showing the most exciting plays of the matches, i.e. the goals? Isn't not harming the content rights holder's business a major component of fair use? Leave it to technology publication GigaOM, generally an advocate of unfettered Internet consumer freedom, content rights be damned, to kick the tires on this rather obvious issue. You can read the full report here

Suggested Articles

YouTube TV’s price hike gives cable operators breathing room to run the next big TV race, which will be fought and won on the TV UX battleground.

Charter Communications said it will add five “Latino targeted TV networks” to its Spectrum TV lineup.

Among pay TV subscribers and broadband-only subscribers, YouTube and Netflix were among the favorite services featured in makeshift video bundles.