AT&T warns judge that selling off Turner, DirecTV would ‘destroy’ value of Time Warner merger

Time Warner Center. Image courtesy of Time Warner, Inc.
Time Warner Center HQ entrance. (Time Warner Inc.)

AT&T warned Judge Richard Leon, who presided over the Justice Department’s legal challenge to AT&T’s $85 billion acquisition of Time Warner, that selling off Turner or DirecTV as a remedy for approval should not be an option.

In a post-trial briefing, AT&T said that the trial provided no basis for injunctive relief and that “divestitures here would destroy the very consumer value this merger is designed to unlock.”

“Divesting DirecTV would eliminate the price decrease for millions of DirecTV consumers predicted by the government itself, and divesting Turner would eliminate the content innovations and the advertising benefits that put downward pressure on Turner prices. On this record, there is no basis to impose any remedies at all, much less divestitures that would destroy the value of the transaction,” AT&T wrote.

FREE DAILY NEWSLETTER

Like this story? Subscribe to FierceVideo!

The Video industry is an ever-changing world where big ideas come along daily. Cable, Media and Entertainment, Telco, and Tech companies rely on FierceVideo for the latest news, trends, and analysis on video creation and distribution, OTT delivery technologies, content licensing, and advertising strategies. Sign up today to get news and updates delivered to your inbox and read on the go.

According to Reuters, the DOJ last week asked Judge Leon to consider imposing a partial divestiture on the merger.

RELATED: Turner chief tells judge there's no incentive to withhold networks from rival distributors

AT&T also argued that if the court placed any remedial judgments on the acquisition, the DOJ could then in turn use those remedies as the basis for an appeal.

“The Court should avoid such confusion by simply holding that, as the record overwhelmingly showed, the government failed to prove a violation of Section 7 [of the Clayton Act],” AT&T wrote.

AT&T added that the court should reject the DOJ’s portrayal of Turner’s arbitration commitment as a remedy.

Prior to the trial, AT&T announced that Turner would grant all distributors unilateral rights to invoke arbitration and to preclude Turner from going dark while arbitration is pending, thereby reducing Turner’s post-merger leverage and encouraging the parties to reach a deal before the distributor invokes its rights.

With the trial now officially over, Judge Leon has set a June 12 hearing date for a decision on the matter. General consensus among Wall Street analysts and industry insiders is that AT&T has a fairly good chance of winning the case.

 

Suggested Articles

Verizon Media is adding new machine learning-enabled tools to its demand side platform (DSP) to give advertisers more clarity into ad performance across…

SAN FRANCISCO – In the middle of an uncharacteristic early June heat wave in the Bay Area, several key figures from the television industry gathered in the…

Broadcast television isn't going to die anytime soon, but it is sitting on a powder keg that threatens its existence. Platforms like Didja and Locast see…