Cox gets $25M BMG verdict tossed on appeal but won’t have safe harbor protection at retrial

Gavel_Pixabay_800
(Pixabay)

An appellate court tossed a $25 million verdict against Cox Communications in a trial over internet music piracy but ordered the case to be retried without the cable company’s wish that it have safe harbor protections. 

A three-judge panel on the 4th Circuit Court reversed a 2015 Virginia federal court decision on a 2014 lawsuit filed against the privately held MSO by music label BMG, which argued that Cox was negligent in stopping its subscribers from illegally sharing copyrighted music over the internet. 

The appeals court panel ruled that the Virginia court jury received improper instructions. Specifically, the jury was told it could find Cox liable for contributing to the copyright infringement if it “knew or should have known of such infringing activity.” The appeals court ruled that “should have known” is too low of a legal standard. 

FREE DAILY NEWSLETTER

Like this story? Subscribe to FierceVideo!

The Video industry is an ever-changing world where big ideas come along daily. Cable, Media and Entertainment, Telco, and Tech companies rely on FierceVideo for the latest news, trends, and analysis on video creation and distribution, OTT delivery technologies, content licensing, and advertising strategies. Sign up today to get news and updates delivered to your inbox and read on the go.

RELATED: Cox still battling $25M BMG piracy verdict, says it didn’t know infringement was happening

The ruling is mixed for Cox, however, with the panel throwing out the operator’s core defense.

Cox defended itself by arguing that it has protection under federal copyright safe harbor provisions, which immunize ISPs from liability related to user activities. But the provisions only apply if the ISP has and enforces policies related to repeat offenders. 

BMG won the lower court verdict with a smoking gun: emails from Cox executives in which they appeared to discuss ways around rules requiring them to police their customers. Cox attorneys argued to the panel of Appeals Court judges that not only did Cox not have knowledge of the specific infringements on BMG content, the emails didn’t include Cox executives talking about the music label specifically, either.

Suggested Articles

Roku and Innovid are partnering on a new analytics solution to measure daily demographic reach and frequency on TV campaigns run across the Roku platform and…

NCC Media, an advanced advertising joint venture from Comcast, Charter and Cox, has changed its name to Ampersand.

Over the coming months three big new subscription streaming service will drop from Disney, NBCUniversal and WarnerMedia. Disney appears to lead the pack in…